Calculadora para estimar los costos energéticos de actividades físicas

+Fundamentos

Work Based on the 2024 Update by Stephen Herrmann, Erik Willis, and Collaborators.

Research study
¿Qué es Easymets?
Calculadora para evaluar el gasto energético de actividades físicas.
¿Por qué utilizarla?
Te ayudará a minimizar los errores y variaciones entre diferentes sujetos.
¿En qué mejora?
realiza cálculos del gasto energético según las características del individuo.
Compendio de actividades físicas:

Para adultos Actualización 2024

Work Based on the Research of Stephen Herrmann, Erik Willis, and Collaborators.

It was developed with the aim of estimating the energy costs of various physical activities in adults aged 19 to 59 years.

+
Actividades
Físicas
+
Categorías
Físicas
Desde
19 a 59 años
1. What was the compendium developed for?
  • The Compendium was developed to provide a standardized system for measuring and classifying specific physical activities.
  • Its main objective is to facilitate researchers and health professionals in assessing energy expenditure and the health benefits associated with different physical activities.
  • This standardization is crucial for the epidemiology of physical activity and its relationship with health outcomes.

The Compendium serves to:

  • Classify physical activities: Assigns metabolic intensity (MET) codes to various activities, allowing for more effective comparison between them.
  • Evaluate energy expenditure: Provides standardized values that help calculate the caloric expenditure associated with different activities, facilitating public health research.
  • Promote health initiatives: Used by government agencies and organizations to develop policies and programs that encourage physical activity among the population.

The advantages of using the Compendium include:

  • Standardization: Allows for a uniform comparison of the energy costs of different activities, improving the validity and reliability of studies on physical activity.
  • Continuous updates: It has been periodically reviewed (in 2000, 2011, and 2024) to incorporate new scientific findings and adapt to evolving research needs.
  • Inclusion of diverse populations: Recent expansions have included specific compendiums for older adults and wheelchair users, promoting greater inclusivity in physical activity research.

The limitations of the Compendium include:

  • Individual variability: MET values may not accurately reflect energy expenditure in all individuals due to differences in age, body composition, sex, and fitness level.
  • Dependence on Previous Data: Its accuracy depends on previous studies that measured energy expenditure; if these data are inaccurate or limited, the results obtained will be affected.
  • Lack of Specific Context: Although it provides standardized data, it does not always account for contextual factors that may influence energy expenditure during physical activity.

The Compendium addresses differences in energy expenditure through:

  • Age-specific reviews: The latest version includes a Compendium for older adults that considers the unique characteristics of this population, such as lower metabolic rates.
  • Adjustments in MET values: The values are adjusted based on research indicating how energy costs vary among different age groups, ensuring that the data is more representative.
Compendio de actividades físicas:

Herramientas disponibles

You should consider some anthropometric characteristics.

To facilitate the calculation and application of energy expenditure for physical activities, you need to know the category and the corresponding activity number.

01
Calculadora
De actividades físicas, para adultos entre 19 y 59 años.
ACCEDER
02
Buscador
Compendio de actividades físicas, para adultos entre 19 y 59 años.
ACCEDER
Tu ayuda es fundamental

Conviértete en colaborador

More Information

Referencias
Bibliográficas
  • 1.Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Herrmann SD, et al. The Compendium of Physical Activities tracking guide. Available at: https://sites.google.com/site/compendiumofphysicalactivities/. [accessed 04.01.2023].
  • 2.Taylor HL, Jacobs DR, Jr, Schucker B, Knudsen J, Leon AS, Debacker G. A questionnaire for the assessment of leisure time physical activities. J Chronic Dis. 1978;31:741–755. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(78)90058-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Paffenbarger RS, Jr, Wing AL, Hyde RT. Physical activity as an index of heart attack risk in college alumni. Am J Epidemiol. 1978;108:161–175. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Leon AS, et al. Compendium of Physical Activities: Classification of energy costs of human physical activities. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1993;25:71–80. doi: 10.1249/00005768-199301000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Whitt MC, et al. Compendium of physical activities: An update of activity codes and MET intensities. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32(Suppl. 9):S498–S504. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200009001-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Herrmann SD, et al. 2011 Compendium of Physical Activities: A second update of codes and MET values. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43:1575–1581. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31821ece12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Li Y, Liu J, Quan M, et al. Energy cost of household and elder care activities in young-to-middle age Chinese adults. J Phys Act Health. 2022;19:404–408. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2022-0011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Liu J, Li Y, Quan M, et al. Energy cost of reclining, sitting, and standing activities in Chinese adults. Int J Exerc Sci. 2022;15:1202–1211. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Jones DA, Ainsworth BE, Croft JB, Livengood JR, Lloyd E, Yusuf HR. Prevalences of moderate physical activity recommended by the Surgeon General’s Report in US adults: National Health Interview Survey, 1990. Arch Family Med. 1998;7:285–289. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Schmidt N, Gehlhar A, Grüne B, et al. Self-reported pre-pandemic physical activity and likelihood of COVID-19 infection: Data from the first wave of the CoCo-Fakt Survey. Sports Med Open. 2023;9:48. doi: 10.1186/s40798-023-00592-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Irving BA, Davis CK, Brock DW, et al. The metabolic syndrome, hypertriglyceridemic waist, and cardiometabolic risk factor profile in obese women. Obes Metab. 2007;3:50–57. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Piepoli MF. 2016 European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. Int J Behav Med. 2017;24:321–419. doi: 10.1007/s12529-016-9583-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Piercy KL, Troiano RP, Ballard RM, et al. The physical activity guidelines for Americans. JAMA. 2018;320:2020–2028. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.14854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bull FC, Al-Ansari SS, Biddle S, et al. World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Br J Sports Med. 2020;54:1451–1462. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-102955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.O’Loughlin EK, Marashi M, Sabiston CM, Lucibello KM, Sylvestre MP, O’Loughlin JL. Predictors of food and physical activity tracking among young adults. Health Educ Behav. 2023;50:647–657. doi: 10.1177/10901981231159679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Herrmann SD, McMurray RG, Kim Y, Willis EA, Kang M, McCurdy T. The influence of physical characteristics on the resting energy expenditure of youth: A meta-analysis. Am J Hum Biol. 2017;29:3. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.22944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Pfeiffer KA, Watson KB, McMurray RG, et al. Energy cost expression for a Youth Compendium of Physical Activities: Rationale for using age groups. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2018;30:142–149. doi: 10.1123/pes.2016-0249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ridley K, Ainsworth BE, Olds TS. Development of a compendium of energy expenditures for youth. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2008;5:45. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-5-45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Butte NF, Watson KB, Ridley K, et al. A Youth Compendium of Physical Activities: Activity codes and metabolic intensities. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018;50:246–256. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Leal-Martin J, Munoz-Munoz M, Keadle SK, et al. Resting oxygen uptake value of 1 metabolic equivalent of task in older adults: A systematic review and descriptive analysis. Sports Med. 2022;52:331–348. doi: 10.1007/s40279-021-01539-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Pontzer H, Yamada Y, Sagayama H, et al. Daily energy expenditure through the human life course. Science. 2021;373:808–812. doi: 10.1126/science.abe5017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Willis EA, Herrmann SD, Barreira TV, et al. Older Adult Compendium of Physical Activities: Energy costs of human physical activities in adults over 60 years. J Sport Health Sci. 2024;13:13–17. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2023.10.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Balke B. The effect of physical exercise on the metabolic potential, a crucial measure of physical fitness. In: Staley S, Cureton TK, Huelster LJ, Barry AJ, editors. Exercise and fitness. Chicago, IL: The Athletic Institute; 1960;8:141–2.
  • 24.Howley ET. You asked for it question authority. ACSM’s Health Fitness J. 1999;3:12–13. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.LaMonte MJ, Manson JE, Chomistek AK, et al. Physical activity and incidence of heart failure in postmenopausal women. JACC Heart Fail. 2018;6:983–995. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2018.06.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Department of Health Human Services . Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee; Washington, DC: 2018. Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee scientific report. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Jordan M, Donne B, Fletcher D. Only lower limb controlled interactive computer gaming enables an effective increase in energy expenditure. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2011;111:1465–1472. doi: 10.1007/s00421-010-1773-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Wu PT, Wu WL, Chu IH. Energy expenditure and intensity in healthy young adults during Exergaming. Am J Health Behav. 2015;39:557–561. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.39.4.12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Sanders GJ, Peacock CA, Williamson ML, Von Carlowitz KP, Barkley JE. Physiologic responses, liking and motivation for playing the same video game on an active versus a traditional, non-active gaming system. Int J Exerc Sci. 2012;5:160–169. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Naugle KE, Carey C, Ohlman T, Godza M, Mikesky A, Naugle KM. Improving active gaming’s energy expenditure in healthy adults using structured playing instructions for the Nintendo Wii and XBOX Kinect. J Strength Cond Res. 2019;33:549–558. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Hu J, Browne JD, Arnold MT, et al. Physiological and metabolic requirements, and user-perceived exertion of immersive virtual reality exergaming incorporating an adaptive cable resistance system: An exploratory study. Games Health J. 2021;10:361–369. doi: 10.1089/g4h.2021.0031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Morgan TL, Faught E, Ross-White A, et al. Tools to guide clinical discussions on physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and/or sleep for health promotion between primary care providers and adults accessing care: A scoping review. BMC Prim Care. 2023;24:140. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02091-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Colley RC, Lang JJ, Saunders TJ, Roberts KC, Butler GP, Prince SA. How sedentary are Canadian adults? It depends on the measure. Health Rep. 2022;33:14–27. doi: 10.25318/82-003-x202201000002-eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Rollo S, Lang JJ, Roberts KC, et al. Health associations with meeting the Canadian 24-hour movement guidelines for adults: Results from the Canadian Health Measures Survey. Health Rep. 2022;33:16–26. doi: 10.25318/82-003-x202200100002-eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Zapata-Lamana R, Lalanza JF, Losilla JM, Parrado E, Capdevila L. mHealth technology for ecological momentary assessment in physical activity research: A systematic review. PeerJ. 2020;8:e8848. doi: 10.7717/peerj.8848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Giurgiu M, Timm I, Becker M, et al. Quality evaluation of free-living validation studies for the assessment of 24-hour physical behavior in adults via wearables: Systematic review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022;10:e36377. doi: 10.2196/36377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Gill JM, Chico TJ, Doherty A, et al. Potential impact of wearables on physical activity guidelines and interventions: Opportunities and challenges. Br J Sports Med. 2023;57:1223–1225. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2023-106822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Harris JA, Benedict FG. A biometric study of human basal metabolism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1918;4:370–373. doi: 10.1073/pnas.4.12.370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Roubenoff R, Hughes VA, Dallal GE, et al. The effect of gender and body composition method on the apparent decline in lean mass-adjusted resting metabolic rate with age. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2000;55:M757–M760. doi: 10.1093/gerona/55.12.m757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Herrmann SD, McMurray RG, Kim Y, Willis EA, Kang M, McCurdy T. The influence of physical characteristics on the resting energy expenditure of youth: A meta-analysis. Am J Hum Biol. 2017;29:e22944. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.22944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Browning RC, Reynolds MM, Board WJ, Walters KA. Reiser 2nd RF. Obesity does not impair walking economy across a range of speeds and grades. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2013;114:1125–1131. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00765.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Byrne N, Hills AP, Hunter GR, Weinsier RL, Schutz Y. Metabolic equivalent: One size does not fit all. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2005;99:1112–1119. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00023.2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kozey S, Lyden K, Staudenmayer J, Freedson P. Errors in MET estimates of physical activities using 3.5 mL/kg/min as the baseline oxygen consumption. J Phys Act Health. 2010;7:508–516. doi: 10.1123/jpah.7.4.508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
¿Necesitas ayuda?